On April 18, 2024, the Court of Justice delivered its judgement on the questions referred to it by the Prague Municipal Court in the Heureka v. Google case.
Heureka Group (“Heureka”), a Czech comparison shopping service company (“CSS”) brought an action before the Municipal Court of Prague in the Czech Republic, seeking compensation from Google for the harm it allegedly suffered as a result of Google’s abusive behavior as part of the Google Shopping decision. The referring court sought clarification about whether Article 10 of Directive 2014/104 (the “Damages Directive”) and/or Article 102 TFEU preclude the effects of a national law that requires parties seeking compensation for competition infringements to file suit within three years of the occurrence of the harm. The Court of Justice ruled that Article 102 TFEU and the principle of effectiveness require the suspension of limitation periods during the Commission’s investigation. The limitation period will only start running when the injured party knows the information necessary to bring its claim, which is presumed to be as of the date of the publication of the summary of the Commission’s infringement decision in the Official Journal of the EU. Additionally, the injured party, Heureka in this instance, can then rely on the findings of a Commission decision under appeal, as it is binding in nature, unless and until it has been annulled.
Please click here to continue reading on the Cleary Antitrust Watch blog.